From 4ad311ec0a6837b7c83bcfd1a1bf12cceb03f363 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: m0viefreak <m0viefreak.cm@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 20:08:12 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?driver:=20Enable=20highlighting=20during=20isea?=
=?UTF-8?q?rch=20under=20zsh=E2=89=A55.3.?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
This patch causes a behaviour difference in the [i257] scenario:
- Before this change, the zle_highlight[isearch] is applied and z-sy-h's
highlighting isn't.
- With this change, both zle_highlight[isearch] and z-sy-h's
highlighting are applied, so «echo foo» renders the first word in green
underline (fg=green from ZSH_HIGHLIGHT_STYLES[builtin], underline from
zle_highlight[isearch]).
This patch causes the presuppositional FAQ entry added in
a8fe22d422515a46a4c2e968ff37762c577059bc to be correct.
This is part of #261, of which #288 was a spin-off.
[i257] https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-syntax-highlighting/pull/257#issuecomment-168394665
---
zsh-syntax-highlighting.zsh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/zsh-syntax-highlighting.zsh b/zsh-syntax-highlighting.zsh
index de3fea9..7879216 100644
--- a/zsh-syntax-highlighting.zsh
+++ b/zsh-syntax-highlighting.zsh
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ _zsh_highlight()
# Remove all highlighting in isearch, so that only the underlining done by zsh itself remains.
# For details see FAQ entry 'Why does syntax highlighting not work while searching history?'.
- if [[ $WIDGET == zle-isearch-update ]]; then
+ if [[ $WIDGET == zle-isearch-update ]] && ! (( $+ISEARCHMATCH_ACTIVE )); then
region_highlight=()
return $ret
fi